Ginger In the Morning (1974)

Oh man, that early 70’s generation gap.

Ginger (Sissy Spacek in her first starring role) is an attractive young hitchhiker who shacks up with a lonely, middle-aged ad guy (Monte Markham, We Are Still Here) who just got divorced.

Can he learn from her free spirit? Will she break him out of his shell? Will his friends act like jerks? Yes. Yes. Yes.

Mark Miller from Please Don’t Eat the Daisies, David Doyle (Bosley from Charlie’s Angels) and Fred Ward — yes, Remo Williams — are all in this.

This is an early version of the manic pixie dream girl trope (there’s a great article-slideshow about 14, present-day, “manic pixie dream girl” movies at Refinery 29; and wouldn’t you know it: Wikipedia has a page dedicated to the, what they describe as a “trope” genre, as well). So watch Ginger in the Morning and think about 1974, a time when AIDS was a myth and the only pandemic we were worried about were killer bees.

You can watch this on Amazon Prime and YouTube.

So you’ve got a free movie — and you learned about the Manic Pixie Dream Girl (MPDG) stock character-trope in film. Hey, we do what we can to expand the film horizons at B&S.

5 thoughts on “Ginger In the Morning (1974)

      • Actually, Sam, as well as myself, have been employed in the journalism and marketing fields—as well as working in specific professional disciplines (automotive, medical, broadcasting, electronics, construction and architectural, for example; we’ve each written multiple commercials that aired on commercial TV and radio stations)—for over 25 years, each (and longer, for myself). The same holds true for each and every one of our guest writers: all are professionally paid writers in their “day jobs,” if you will. Sam and myself, as well as a few of our guest writers, have also been gainfully employed as ghost writers and have a couple books under our belts. We’ve also published/operated magazines. While we’ve each written in the entertainment fields—music and film—those assignments/careers simply do not pay as well as in other non-entertainment fields and/or marketing firms.

        As far as B&S is concerned: We are up to our necks in promotional DVDs and Blus, as well as multi-disc box sets, provided to us by a wide, wide variety of reissues labels. Then there are the newly-released DVD/Blus by other indie-studios (as well as the too-many digital screeners; it’s been a long, long while since we’ve had to pay to see, or buy, our own movies). Then there are the public relations firms that approach us for reviews (and those connections continue to grow, with new firms reaching out)—as well as with interview requests with actors and directors, even writers of film tomes—to promote their films and books. Then there are the indie writer-directors (fans of our site) who contact us on a daily basis to review their films. And it has to be noted: we do not contact them, they reach out to us.

        Not that we feel obligated to supply our stats, but a typical day is over 1,500 views from over 600 visitors—worldwide (those numbers to rank higher, some days, much higher). More than three-quarters of that come from search engine hits and the IMDb, so the B&S name is, in fact, well respected. And when someone goes to the IMDb, amid all of the review links they could chose, they chose B&S as their review source. And we are constantly receiving emails and feedback—not just from readers that enjoyed us reviewing their favorite film, but from actors and filmmakers of old who thank us for remembering their film/work. In fact, I just reviewed two, lost forgotten VHS’ers solely based on a reader asking us to review said movies. And, when they contribute in the constructive, we’ve even incorporated that new film trivia/info into the review—and credit them, in full.

        So, all in all, everyone at B&S does quite well at being “paid” for our writing. And we a have large, loyal, always-growing, fan base.

        The writing we do at B&S and the maintenance of the site, is in addition to our paid “day jobs” as writers. B&S isn’t about money and never will be. In fact, the day a pop-up ad or banner ad appears on the site, I’ll will personally quit writing for B&S. Sometimes, the greatest “pay” you can receive are the ones that are pure labors of love. We love writing. We love music and movies. We’re always writing—for physical, dollar pay, and for passion. The passion writing pays better, every time.

        Again, as Sam offered: Anytime you’d like to contribute a review—out of a pure love of film—you are more than welcome. It will surely expand your personal brand awareness, in the positive.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.